You've probably heard the sceptics…
"Four minutes isn't long enough to know if there's chemistry."
"You need time to really get to know someone."
"Speed dating is too superficial to find real connection."
Here's what science actually says: they're completely wrong.
Not only can you feel genuine chemistry in four minutes, but those first few minutes are often more accurate predictors of compatibility than hours of texting or perfectly curated dating profiles. Your brain is making thousands of calculations in those initial moments, and it's remarkably good at its job.
When you meet someone for the first time, your brain becomes a processing powerhouse. Within milliseconds, you're unconsciously evaluating everything from facial symmetry to vocal tone, body language to pheromones.
This isn't shallow – it's biology. Your brain is running complex algorithms developed over millions of years of evolution, designed to assess compatibility, trustworthiness, and attraction faster than you can consciously think.
Research from Princeton University found that people form impressions of trustworthiness, competence, and likability in just one-tenth of a second. These snap judgements, whilst not infallible, are surprisingly accurate and remarkably resistant to change even with more information.
Helpful Guide: Understanding the psychology of first impressions in speed dating helps explain why those initial moments carry so much weight.
When you feel that spark with someone, you're not imagining it – you're experiencing a genuine neurochemical reaction. Your brain releases a cocktail of chemicals, including dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin.
Dopamine creates that euphoric feeling and heightened focus. It's the same chemical released when you eat chocolate or win money. Norepinephrine increases your heart rate and makes you feel energised. Together, they create that "can't stop thinking about them" feeling.
This chemical cascade happens quickly. You don't need hours to feel it – in fact, if the chemistry is genuinely there, you'll often feel it within the first minute or two. The remaining time simply confirms what your body already knows.
Speed dating events typically give you four to five minutes per person, and there's solid science behind this timing. It's long enough to move past purely physical first impressions but short enough to rely on genuine instinct rather than overthinking.
Four minutes forces you to be present and engaged. You can't spend twenty minutes crafting the perfect witty response like you would over text. You have to rely on natural conversation skills and genuine connection – precisely the skills you'll need in an actual relationship.
Those who excel at speed dating often report that they knew within the first minute whether they wanted to see someone again. The remaining time simply reinforced that initial gut feeling.
One of the most powerful aspects of in-person chemistry happens through eye contact, and it's impossible to replicate through a screen.
When you look into someone's eyes, your brains synchronise. Neuroscientists call this "neural coupling" – your brain activity begins to mirror the other person's. This synchronisation creates feelings of understanding and connection.
A famous study by psychologist Arthur Aron found that just four minutes of sustained eye contact between strangers could create feelings of attraction and closeness.
This is why video calls (whilst better than nothing), still feel different from face-to-face meetings. The neural synchronisation that happens through direct eye contact is diminished through screens.
Ever met someone and immediately felt comfortable, like you'd known them for ages? Or conversely, felt inexplicably uncomfortable despite the person seeming perfectly nice on paper? That's your body reading micro-signals your conscious mind hasn't processed yet.
You're unconsciously picking up on body language, facial micro-expressions, vocal patterns, and even scent. These subtle cues tell you volumes about a person's emotional state, authenticity, and compatibility with you.
Learning to trust these instincts, whilst also being aware of common pitfalls covered in common speed dating mistakes, helps you make better decisions.
Psychologist Malcolm Gladwell popularised the concept of "thin-slicing" – our ability to find patterns and make accurate judgements from narrow windows of experience. Your brain is constantly thin-slicing, especially in social situations.
Studies have shown that people can accurately predict relationship success from watching just three minutes of a couple's interaction. Teachers can assess student performance from a two-second silent video clip with surprising accuracy.
Your ability to assess romantic compatibility works the same way. You don't need someone's life story to know if there's potential. In fact, too much information can sometimes cloud your judgement, leading you to rationalise away what your instincts are telling you.
This is why knowing what questions spark real connection matters – the right questions in a short time reveal genuine compatibility.
Here's something crucial: genuine chemistry and anxiety can feel similar initially, but they're fundamentally different.
Chemistry makes you feel energised but comfortable. Anxiety makes you feel energised but on edge.
Chemistry draws you in. Anxiety hooks you.
Chemistry feels reciprocal. Anxiety feels one-sided and uncertain.
In four minutes, you can usually tell the difference. Does this person's presence make you feel more yourself or less? Do you feel seen and heard, or are you performing? Is the conversation flowing naturally, or are you working hard to keep it going?
People with anxious attachment styles often mistake anxiety for chemistry. Understanding emotional availability helps distinguish between genuine connection and familiar but unhealthy patterns.
One of the most reliable indicators of chemistry in those first few minutes is conversation flow. When chemistry exists, conversation feels effortless. Topics flow naturally from one to another. Silences feel comfortable rather than awkward.
If you're constantly searching for topics or struggling to find common ground in four minutes, more time rarely fixes that. Conversely, when chemistry is present, four minutes often feels too short – you could happily talk for hours.
Those awkward silent moments in speed dating tell you something important: either the chemistry isn't there, or one of you is too nervous to let it flow naturally.
Are there exceptions? Of course. Some people are naturally slow to warm up. Introverts might need more time to feel comfortable and show their personality.
However, if you both feel that you've only scratched the surface and want more time, that desire for continuation is itself a sign of chemistry. You're not looking for instant soulmate recognition – you're looking for enough spark to justify a proper first date.
Think of speed dating as a chemistry screening, not a final compatibility assessment. Four minutes tells you whether someone warrants further investigation. The deep getting-to-know-you conversations happen on actual dates with people who passed the initial chemistry test.
Women often report having strong intuitive feelings about people, and science backs this up. Research suggests women are generally better at reading emotional cues and non-verbal communication than men.
But regardless of gender, we all have intuition about people – that gut feeling that something's right or wrong. In four minutes, you have enough information for your intuition to activate.
The key is distinguishing between intuition and fear. Intuition feels calm and knowing. Fear feels urgent and panicky. If someone gives you genuinely bad vibes in four minutes, trust that. Your subconscious has likely picked up on something important.
Here's perhaps the most important scientific finding: your initial impressions are often more accurate than your later rationalisations.
When you overthink a situation, you often talk yourself into or out of things your instincts correctly identified initially. That person who seemed lovely but left you feeling flat? More time rarely changes that. The person who sparked genuine interest despite not being your usual type? That's worth exploring.
Four minutes gives you enough time to feel chemistry without enough time to override it with overthinking. It's actually the sweet spot between snap judgements and analysis paralysis.